<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><br><br>sent from a phone</div><div><br>On 4 Mar 2017, at 08:49, Jochen Topf <<a href="mailto:jochen@remote.org">jochen@remote.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>Looking at the graphs on <span><a href="http://area.jochentopf.com/stats">http://area.jochentopf.com/stats</a></span> you can see</span><br><span>that the number of (multi)polygons is growing steadily, while the number</span><br><span>of errors has been more or less flat over the last half year. </span></div></blockquote><br><div><br></div><div>nice stats and good results.</div><div>I want to point out though that "</div><h2 style="padding: 4px;"><font size="3"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Errors: Inner rings with same tags as outer rings"</span></font></h2><div><font size="3"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">are not necessarily errors, and should not be "fixed" unless you know very well the situation and can tell that there's indeed a redundancy/data problem. E.g. you can have a building or building:part inside another building or building:part. These could be tagged still "incompletely" hence having just the same tags for the moment but be different objects nonetheless. Similarly woods inside woods, etc.</span></font></div><div><font size="3"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></font></div><div><font size="3"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Cheers,</span></font></div><div><font size="3"><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Martin </span></font></div></body></html>