<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
(Could repliers please 'To:' the OSM list *not* the personal address
of the sender)<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/05/2017 13:32, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTBtL_9-iQe6_W7w6wPKViFxX9hzLt2GJY0fLGPt_tsrkQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2017-05-26 11:56 GMT+02:00 Dave F <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:davefoxfac63@btinternet.com"
target="_blank">davefoxfac63@btinternet.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Quantity
is not quality, as you note above.</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Quality concerns are part of the reason
why notes were introduced: to give an easy feedback
possibility without a risk to damage actual map data.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
But the feedback is majoritively of a poor quality, providing little
improvement to the OSM database<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABPTjTBtL_9-iQe6_W7w6wPKViFxX9hzLt2GJY0fLGPt_tsrkQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"> as long as we can deal with incoming
notes, it is OK. If they're beginning to pile than we could
require a feedback address (login or some other kind of auth)
to reduce the quantity and to raise the chance for actual
communication in case of questions.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I'd be happy with 10 million notes as long as they led to an
increase in accuracy of the OSM database. Unfortunately that's just
not the situation.<br>
<br>
DaveF.<br>
</body>
</html>