<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">I've always thought there should be three types of cycle tagging, direct, not too dangerous, and safer back routes but I'm not sure how that would work.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">Cheerio John<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 15 July 2017 at 18:45, Rodrigo Rodríguez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:listas@mundonomada.info" target="_blank">listas@mundonomada.info</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello,<br>
<br>
I'm trying to map bicycle-friendly ways in my city [Managua], which<br>
doesn't have any cycleways or lanes. I'm wondering whether I should use<br>
the "class=bicycle" to map those ways where I usually ride on my bike<br>
sharing with the whole traffic (cars, buses, etc.)<br>
<br>
Is this the case where I can use this tag? I'm expecting some comments<br>
based on your cyclist mapping experience.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>