<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 04.08.2017 um 13:22 schrieb Frederik
Ramm:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:ea4ead75-49a3-2b57-a1ff-b3b7232be238@remote.org"><br>
<pre wrap="">remely unwieldy product names that just cause trouble" :-)).
</pre>
<pre wrap="">
I've always thought that using this name would the honest approach,
rather than selling a product called "Geofabrik's cool Geodata"
something or other, where the fact that it's 100% processed OSM is
somewhere in the small print.</pre>
</blockquote>
Well how small the small print is, is your choice :-). <br>
<br>
If you create a borderline case, you can't really complain if there
is an extra hoop or two to jump through. So you probably would need
permission, which likely would be contingent on a) it remaining true
that this is 100% OSM data and b) adding a notice, similar to what
Christoph already mentioned, to your product description. Naturally
in the case of GeoFabrik the problem is actually finding somebody
without a CoI that could decide on the matter.<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:ea4ead75-49a3-2b57-a1ff-b3b7232be238@remote.org">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">A personal note: one of my pet peeves are the awful unimaginative,
uncreative and descriptive product and service names used in OSM-space,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I don't see why I should call something that simply is an OSM WMS by a
creative name that requires everyone to follow an extra indirection to
understand what it is.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
I don't really think some thing like:<br>
<br>
<b><i>GeoFabrik Awesone WMS Services</i></b><i><br>
</i><i><br>
</i><i>100% guaranteed wholesome OpenStreetMap(TM) data served hot
from replication.</i><br>
<br>
Really counts as "an extra indirection" <br>
<br>
Simon<br>
</body>
</html>