<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div>Please, PLEASE, stick to the case.<br><br></div>The case is:<br></div>1) there are two hillforts, let's call them Hillfort 1 and Hillfort 2 for simplicity.<br></div>2) both have big information tables on the ground, with their names on them<br></div>3) so they are named Hillfort 1 and Hillfort 2 in OSM and nobody objects that.<br></div>4) both have their articles on Wikipedia. The articles may be a little mixed up, but they are articles on Hillfort 1 and Hillfort 2<br><br></div>Why, in this case is it better to have Wikipedia links in OSM point to disambiguation page instead of link Hillfort 1 in OSM to Hillfort 1 in Wikipedia, link Hillfort 2 accordingly and fix Wikipedia doubts in Wikipedia?<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 23 October 2017 at 13:33, Andy Townsend <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ajt1047@gmail.com" target="_blank">ajt1047@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 23/10/2017 11:40, Ryszard Mikke wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
That seems like a problem to fix in Wikipedia<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Part of the problem is that some of these problems simply aren't fixable at wikipedia. For example <a href="https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/<wbr>%D0%A1%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%98<wbr>%D0%B0</a> and <a href="https://sq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbia" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://sq.wikipedia.org/wiki/<wbr>Serbia</a> are allegedly the same article and <a href="https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q403" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/<wbr>Q403</a> lists them both. However, as can be seen by looking at the maps on each page, they aren't the same geographic entity - one includes Kosovo, one does not. Neither is "wrong" from the point of view of the authors of each page yet they can't both be "correct" at the same time.<br>
<br>
Best Regards,<br>
Andy<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.or<wbr>g/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">--<br><a href="http://tnij.com/WyszukiwarkaRowerowa" target="_blank">http://tnij.com/WyszukiwarkaRowerowa</a> <a href="http://jolanta.korwin-mikke.pl/" target="_blank">http://jolanta.korwin-mikke.pl/</a><br><a href="mailto:R.Mikke@pl.vwfsag.de" target="_blank">R.Mikke@pl.vwfsag.de</a> <a href="mailto:Ryszard.Mikke@gmail.com" target="_blank">Ryszard.Mikke@gmail.com</a><br><span lang="ar"><span> دراجة</span> <span></span></span><span lang="ar"><span>أكبر</span></span></div></div>
</div>