<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 24 October 2017 at 17:19, Tomas Straupis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tomasstraupis@gmail.com" target="_blank">tomasstraupis@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">2017-10-24 15:56 GMT+03:00 Ryszard Mikke wrote:<br>
> Why, in this case is it better to have Wikipedia links in OSM point to<br>
> disambiguation page instead of link Hillfort 1 in OSM to Hillfort 1 in<br>
> Wikipedia, link Hillfort 2 accordingly and fix Wikipedia doubts in<br>
> Wikipedia?<br>
<br>
</span> So that the case is not forgotten and fixed properly (i.e. ALL tags<br>
fixed) by people who know how to do it, not by those who are doing<br>
guesswork and just silencing the "qa" script.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You mean "stop any editing, cause we need two weeks or two years to make sure refs are correct and we don't have any other means to remember about the problem than to leave some obvious mistake everyone will trip over until we are sure about those refs"? Like, start a discussion at one of the hillfort articles in Wikipedia and live a note inOSM to check refs from time to time, with a link to the Wikipedia discussion?<br></div></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">--<br><a href="http://tnij.com/WyszukiwarkaRowerowa" target="_blank">http://tnij.com/WyszukiwarkaRowerowa</a> <a href="http://jolanta.korwin-mikke.pl/" target="_blank">http://jolanta.korwin-mikke.pl/</a><br><a href="mailto:R.Mikke@pl.vwfsag.de" target="_blank">R.Mikke@pl.vwfsag.de</a> <a href="mailto:Ryszard.Mikke@gmail.com" target="_blank">Ryszard.Mikke@gmail.com</a><br><span lang="ar"><span> دراجة</span> <span></span></span><span lang="ar"><span>أكبر</span></span></div></div>
</div></div>