<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">25.10.2017 7:46, Tomas Straupis пишет:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+f=8=qwXpLa81PeO6i095r--LNp2h0i0u2GZi4pjE7uqYG5zg@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap=""> But this topic has already listed numerous problems with your
automated (or semiautomated) edits all around, ignoring local
communities etc. You have been asked to stop numerous times.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Well. That's the problem in your position: you point to specific
problems and ask to stop whole process.<br>
So instead of fix these problems (you did not ask for this) people
just ignore you.<br>
<br>
I met such behaviour with software implementation: people reject to
use software miss some feature even when software already do half of
their job.<br>
<br>
I don't think any number of problems with automated edits is reason
to stop them. I think it is reason to fix problems. Like: don't fix
<span class="wikibase-descriptionview-text">disambiguation wikipedia
links if there is wikidata point to </span><br>
<span class="wikibase-descriptionview-text"><span
class="wikibase-descriptionview-text">disambiguation page(i.e.
it is intentionally </span></span><span
class="wikibase-descriptionview-text"><span
class="wikibase-descriptionview-text"><span
class="wikibase-descriptionview-text">disambiguation link)</span>
and don't add wikidata to </span></span><span
class="wikibase-descriptionview-text"><span
class="wikibase-descriptionview-text"><span
class="wikibase-descriptionview-text">disambiguation wikipedia
page</span>.<br>
<br>
Otherwise on next step we should ask to stop using of wikipedia
links: only name=* could be validated on the ground, there is no
label on object with wikipedia URL and 'guessed' wiki links
sometimes became wrong.<br>
</span></span>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
С уважением, Златовратский Павел. </pre>
</body>
</html>