<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
      On 27-Oct-17 12:00 AM, Joseph Reeves wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMMi1a3hvDuvFvoA-bKxxxRUwMCXt7aYThXn4sJWDVtGN8B80w@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px;border:none;padding:0px">
          <div><span style="font-size:12.8px">A problem i find is with
              landuse=forest. Formally, those are zones that are used
              for growing trees. But practically in OSM, that tag is
              used for any land that is covered with trees. So formally,
              landuse=forest shouldn't overlap with other zones, but
              practically, until a new tag (landcover=trees) is
              rendered, this rule isn't going to be followed.</span></div>
        </blockquote>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Getting off topic, I think you want natural=wood :</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood"
          moz-do-not-send="true">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood</a><br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    While natural=wood renders, I also tag them as landcover=trees as
    that is more truthful of what is there.  <br>
    So these tree areas get two tags from me until such time as
    landcover is rendered then I will remove the natural tag. <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMMi1a3hvDuvFvoA-bKxxxRUwMCXt7aYThXn4sJWDVtGN8B80w@mail.gmail.com">
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On 26 October 2017 at 13:37, Janko
          Mihelić <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:janjko@gmail.com"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">janjko@gmail.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>I like the idea of formalizing OSM topology!<br>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                  An example: power lines should share nodes with
                  nothing except power towers, portals and buildings
                  (substation buildings).<br>
                  <br>
                </div>
                A problem i find is with landuse=forest. Formally, those
                are zones that are used for growing trees. But
                practically in OSM, that tag is used for any land that
                is covered with trees. So formally, landuse=forest
                shouldn't overlap with other zones, but practically,
                until a new tag (landcover=trees) is rendered, this rule
                isn't going to be followed.<span class="HOEnZb"><font
                    color="#888888"><br>
                    <br>
                  </font></span></div>
              <span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">Janko<br>
                </font></span></div>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5"><br>
                <div class="gmail_quote">
                  <div dir="ltr">sri, 25. lis 2017. u 18:41 Martin
                    Koppenhoefer <<a
                      href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>>
                    napisao je:<br>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
                    <br>
                    sent from a phone<br>
                    <br>
                    > On 25. Oct 2017, at 17:36, Gaurav Thapa <<a
                      href="mailto:gthapa.work@gmail.com"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gthapa.work@gmail.com</a>>
                    wrote:<br>
                    ><br>
                    > In Nepal we have been trying to make sure that
                    each constructed building has its own footprint and
                    is not connected to a neighbouring structure via a
                    shared wall. We do this as in reality this is the
                    case as each building structure though built next to
                    each other has its own footprint (independent
                    foundation).<br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    yes, you can find both situations: a single dividing
                    wall used by both neighboring buildings (in Europe
                    this occurs mostly with medieval buildings), or each
                    building has its own walls (and foundations), but
                    without a significant space between them (e.g. 2 cm
                    of insulating material).<br>
                    <br>
                    I would treat both situations the same and use
                    shared nodes, but maybe wouldn’t object if someone
                    purposefully mapped the latter as 2 almost-touching
                    buildings, although the osm building ways usually
                    describe the footprint of the completed building
                    (i.e. with facades, cladding etc.) and not the raw
                    load bearing structure.<br>
                    <br>
                    cheers,<br>
                    Martin<br>
                    ______________________________<wbr>_________________</blockquote>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>