<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 27-Oct-17 09:20 PM, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CABPTjTCLMRw+BeuMPGixUSSyM44XxKa0uyicTokxG_b-ogSR_Q@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote"><br>
<div>I can't ignore the landcover argument in this context,
and still believe the natural= key should mean: "a
geographic feature", not "something natural" (as opposed
to artificial). I would tag a peak with natural=peak
regardless of human intervention, it's a peak. In this
sense, natural=wood means a "wood", and as not all areas
of trees are woods, I'd question this statement.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
A peak, yes. But where the entire hill is made from the tailings of
an open cut mine (very large - both the hill and the mine) I don't
think it can be said to be 'natural'. It is man made. <br>
And this particular peak is prominent in the surrounding landscape,
it is used as a tourist view point for the district. <br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CABPTjTCLMRw+BeuMPGixUSSyM44XxKa0uyicTokxG_b-ogSR_Q@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">As with
other entities, any further details which gives clarity
should be provided in sub-tags.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>as always, all tags should make sense, subtags are for
further details, not to adjust/relativise the meaning of
the main tag.<br>
</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
+1<br>
</body>
</html>