<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I only think I will print Frederick's mails, and regularly read them
again and again.<br>
Deprecated implies «bad, should not exist in OSM database, no one
reviewed this object for the last years». It has very strong
implications in OSM vocabulary. Using it here would have the effect
to readers «Yes, if it's deprecated, of course it should be
deleted». No, they are not deprecated, they only are useless to
software parsers. They may be useful for contributors. <br>
I will not answer anymore to this thread. It feels too much like a
scientific paper submission: If you answer to every objection, even
sometimes with halt-truth, there will come a time when there is no
more to say. <br>
JB.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 13/11/2017 à 11:27, Yuri Astrakhan a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJGfNe_NDco_5JuYNNJ338HmpgPfXzzLZGobGns1JjqqMEtuDg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">JB, try to avoid swearword outburst, not helpful.
Are you taking issue with the word "deprecated"? The proper
word should probably have been "unnecessary" to discuss the
layer=0, per JOSM's naming:
<div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/data/validator/unnecessary.mapcss">https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/data/validator/unnecessary.mapcss</a>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The wiki deprecation only lists one =no: highway=no, but
we are not discussing that one yet -- <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I used the word "deprecated" in a more general term, to
mean anything that community has decided to phase out, such as
JOSM autofixes and deprecation list.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I have no clue what you meant otherwise about mixing
issues. I am attempting to answer every possible question
being raised. So far there has been a few very constructive
and helpful emails, and lots of sidetracks. If you want to
stay focused, re-read my initial post, as well as my most
latest post with the new tool capabilities, or just read the
Sophox wiki page and try to follow the style of Simon &
Tobias - both have raised valid objections, and in both cases
it resulted in tool's improvements.</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:05 AM, JB <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jbosm@mailoo.org" target="_blank">jbosm@mailoo.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"><span class="im HOEnZb">Le
13/11/2017 à 01:16, Yuri Astrakhan a écrit :<br>
</span><span class="im HOEnZb">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
You are right that =0 and =no seem like nobrainers, but
if we have listed them as deprecated, we should not use
them. <br>
</blockquote>
</span><span class="im HOEnZb">
Deprecated? Where did you find that?<br>
(Swearwords somewhere here. Did someone already said that
you mix issues?)<br>
<br>
</span>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.or<wbr>g/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>