<div dir="ltr"><div>Christoph, unregenerate implies I should apologize for doing a wrong thing. In the discussion, the only thing I **actually did** was I wrote a new tool and posted about it. Was I wrong to write a tool? Was I wrong to discuss it with the community?<br><br>I patiently sifted through all the negative comments and addressed the issues. I address Fredrerick's issue about zoom, I addressed Andy's comment about domain name and lack of https, I listened to Simon's comment about reject button. I simplified DWG's ability to find and revert relevant changesets. And many other issues.<br><br></div>Should I apologize for not listening? But as you can clearly see from all the changes, I listened very attentively, and tried to address every single point. Should I apologize for writing software that uses the same concepts and ideas as other similar tools? Should I apologize for holding a different opinion than some of the community, while clearly supported by, perhaps a less vocal minority?<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Christoph Hormann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:osm@imagico.de" target="_blank">osm@imagico.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Wednesday 22 November 2017, Richard Fairhurst wrote:<br>
><br>
> Worth noting that WeeklyOSM is produced alongside and seeded by the<br>
> German Wochennotiz. I don't sprechen sufficient Deutsch to be<br>
> certain, but it looks like the German original[1] is more carefully<br>
> worded and less presumptuous. So the controversial second half is<br>
> very possibly just a clumsy translation.<br>
<br>
</span>For understanding - and i don't want to support any further attempts in<br>
telling the WeeklyOSM team how to do their work with that - the German<br>
version uses the term 'uneinsichtig' - which might also be translated<br>
as unregenerate.<br>
<br>
My attempt at a translation of the German text would be:<br>
<br>
"Yuri is perceived by many in this discussion, in a similar way as in<br>
previous discussions, as unreasonable/unregenerate and questions the<br>
relevancy of the unwritten rules of OSM."<br>
<span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
--<br>
Christoph Hormann<br>
<a href="http://www.imagico.de/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.imagico.de/</a><br>
<br>
</span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>