<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Isn't this a bit a "what if"? <br>
</p>
<p>Definitely the OSMF is not requiring or asking anybody to discuss
topics on media that are not operated by the foundation and as you
know provides a variety of options (changeset comments, diaries,
mailing lists and forums) that can be used without involving third
parties. iD now suggests options that are not OSMF operated, but
that content is not curated by the OSMF.<br>
</p>
<p>Further the intro to the privacy policy actually touches on the
issue <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_Policy">https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_Policy</a> <br>
</p>
Simon<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 17.04.2018 um 07:51 schrieb Andrew
Hain:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:LNXP265MB0042DE338D2C5FBDDB0CA0A4E6B70@LNXP265MB0042.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
The issue would be that we are asking someone to trust an external
provider. At worst we could be responsible for propagating their
noncompliance with the GDPR.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Andrewm
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt"
face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>From:</b>
Kathleen Lu <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:kathleen.lu@mapbox.com"><kathleen.lu@mapbox.com></a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> 16 April 2018 23:11:11<br>
<b>To:</b> Andrew Hain<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [OSM-talk] External contact channels and
GDPR</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>Hi Andrew,<br>
</div>
It's not clear to me why GDPR would make it unacceptable in
general to ask someone to discuss something, whether a
controversial edit or not, in one forum or another, OSMF or
not. What would be the concern?<br>
</div>
-Kathleen<br>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="x_gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:18 PM Andrew Hain
<<a href="mailto:andrewhainosm@hotmail.co.uk"
moz-do-not-send="true">andrewhainosm@hotmail.co.uk</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;
border-left:1px #ccc solid; padding-left:1ex">
<div>When we ask mappers to discuss controversial edits or
imports is it ever acceptable under GDPR to direct people
to a contact channel that is not directly run by the OSMF?<br>
<br>
--<br>
Andrew </div>
_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>