<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
4. Lipiec 2018 10:16 od <a href="mailto:jm@liotier.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">jm@liotier.org</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">I am concerned about the cases where a building does exist in reality, the<br />shape is less than ten meters from its position, some of the shape<br />overlaps the building's position on the imagery and some of the shape<br />resembles some of the building. In those cases, there is some value in the<br />record: approximate position and area of the building. But there is also<br />the liability of having introduced a low-quality object in the database.<br /></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>I would not hesitate to delete such objects. It may mean that countless hours of low-quality</p><p>mapping is gone, but it is not justification to keep such data.<br /></p> </body>
</html>