<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 01.03.2019 um 12:01 schrieb Mateusz
Konieczny:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:LZsub3y--3-1@tutanota.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">Mar 1, 2019, 11:25 AM by
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:simon@poole.ch">simon@poole.ch</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<p>And specifically on the issue with Mapbox customers, one of
the results of the 2014 discussions was this statement by
Mapbox <a class=""
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21847"
rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21847</a>
which a) states that the attribution is be default expanded,
and b) that should be the case "<i>whereever possible" </i>which
in our understanding<i> </i>limits the use of a default
collapsed attribution to cases where it is physically
impossible to show the expanded version, for example very
small map snippets. In 2014 we felt that this was acceptable
(we don't have an formal statement on this iirc), and I would
go out on a limb and say that it would still be considered a
reasonable guideline.<i> </i><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">This is at best outdated.<br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
We've not received any communication from Mapbox that would indicate
that.<br>
</body>
</html>