<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Just a couple of general comments on this.</p>
<p>- The LWG is undertaking an effort to sure up our attribution
guidance this year see
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group/Minutes/2019-01-10">https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group/Minutes/2019-01-10</a></p>
<p>- I would have preferred that the discussion take place when
we've actually written something, because some of the issues
raised have been settled since at least 2014, including obtaining
legal advice on what "reasonably calculated" is, but that's life
:-). In any case the community can expect a draft guideline for
discussion in the upcoming months.<br>
</p>
<p>And specifically on the issue with Mapbox customers, one of the
results of the 2014 discussions was this statement by Mapbox
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21847">https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21847</a> which a)
states that the attribution is be default expanded, and b) that
should be the case "<em>whereever possible" </em>which in our
understanding<em> </em>limits the use of a default collapsed
attribution to cases where it is physically impossible to show the
expanded version, for example very small map snippets. In 2014 we
felt that this was acceptable (we don't have an formal statement
on this iirc), and I would go out on a limb and say that it would
still be considered a reasonable guideline.<em> <br>
</em></p>
<p>Simon<br>
<em></em></p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>