<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Apr 11, 2019, 9:17 AM by yuriastrakhan@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><div style="16px" text-align="left"> Worst case scenario: someone breaks a preset - with so many eyes on them (exposed via wiki pages, used by all editors, monitored via numerous tools, cross-checked by validation queries, etc etc etc), it will be fixed within minutes.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">In case of presets I see problem not with vandalism but with divergent opinions where both sides<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">have good intentions.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">Also, presets are closer to infrastructure like<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Citation_needed&action=edit">https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Citation_needed&action=edit</a><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">that on attempt to edit gets it is a "cascade-protected page, therefore only administrators can edit it."<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">rather than article pages.<br></div> </body>
</html>