<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 17.04.2019 um 22:03 schrieb Mateusz
Konieczny:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:LcgtRdo--3-1@tutanota.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div style="16px" text-align="left">Among other popular wikipedia
links<br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">"wikipedia='de:Stolpersteine'",<br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">"wikipedia='nl:Toeristisch
Overstappunt'",<br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">are also clearly invalid,
though here brand:wikipedia would<br>
</div>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">be wrong and complete removal
is probably necessary.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Martin already commented on de:Stolpersteine. <br>
</p>
<p>The adding of nl:Toeristisch Overstappunt has been questioned on
the tagging list (starting with messages
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:cd1661c0-c6a1-8602-e112-9461357ad055@tobias-wrede.de"><cd1661c0-c6a1-8602-e112-9461357ad055@tobias-wrede.de></a> and
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:a19f1a72-a7d9-f016-0527-ce45fefb42f1@tobias-wrede.de"><a19f1a72-a7d9-f016-0527-ce45fefb42f1@tobias-wrede.de></a>) but
with no apparent outcome. I agree with you, in my opinion they are
still dead wrong.</p>
<p>Tobias<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>