<html dir="ltr"><head></head><body style="text-align:left; direction:ltr;"><div>On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 20:00 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Di., 28. Mai 2019 um 19:56 Uhr schrieb Dave F via talk <<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>>:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex">I notice these changesets were completed in 30/60 seconds respectively.<br>
I don't use iD. How is this possible? Does it have a JOSM like mass edit <br>
ability?<br>
<br>
I don't see asking users to split the changesets as a solution to <br>
what is the clear problem of mass adding/amending tags to <br>
unknown/undocumented ones.</blockquote></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>indeed, I see no way to judge whether the iD suggestion to change objects from crossing=zebra to crossing=marked makes sense, because there is no documentation of crossing=marked. Going by the words, probably any zebra crossing can be seen as a marked crossing so it may not be introducing errors, just reducing specificity/detail.<br></div><div><br></div></div></blockquote><div>Just had a play with iD in my local High Street. </div><div><br></div><div>First edit was a minor one to tidy up a spurious line, iD made no attempt to change any other objects.</div><div><br></div><div>Second edit was to add a tactile paving tag to one of the zebra crossings, it warned me that a marked crossing has outdated tags and wanted to loose valuable information. which I declined but it is easy to see how an inexperienced mapper could be coerced into making such a change.</div><div><br></div><div>As you say marked is undocumented, and zebra is documented.</div><div><br></div><div>Phil (trigpoint)</div></body></html>