<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/10/19 5:28 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPhqi6J4F1QXqK+_XKc05gY0-c=uybt5Bcw89kavzv=_J=EwmA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:47
PM Yves <<a href="mailto:yvecai@mailbox.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">yvecai@mailbox.org</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I think a small '(c)OSM'
for small screen web or app could be suggested as OK, what
do you think?<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Why not revive this dormant proposal for a small
attribution logo that was proposed 6 years ago:<a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RFC_Attribution_Mark"
moz-do-not-send="true">
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RFC_Attribution_Mark</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
I have always wondered why it did not get more attention... But I'm
not the target audience. So, do we have feedback from web designers
- the population who this proposal aims to convince to attribute
properly ?<br>
</body>
</html>