<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">4 lip 2019, 15:20 od snusmumriken.mapper@runbox.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:50 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">I strongly disagree with this idea,<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">and multiple times changed such splits<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">back to one way.<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">I would consider that as an act of vandalism by removing ground truth<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">information that your fellow mappers have gathered and encoded in the<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">database.<br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">I (obviously) add all necessary turn<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">restrictions.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">As result I remove incorrect claim<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">that road is dual carriageway<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">without information loss.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">And why you consider moving to a <br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">standard tagging as a vandalism.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">On topic of ground truth -<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">so far in all cases I did after spotting<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">incorrect mapping during a survey </div> </body>
</html>