<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1140319419.889044.1564134596872@mail.yahoo.com">
<div class="ydp17401ce2yahoo-style-wrap"
style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial,
sans-serif;font-size:16px;">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><span style="font-family:
Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">> <span><span
style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica,
Arial, sans-serif;">Whoever reads this and does not
have deeper insights into the workings of the OSMF
must get into the impression that HOT is an official
part of the OSMF / OpenStreetMap, i.e. OSM is
collaborating with FB.</span></span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><span style="font-family:
Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;"><span><span
style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica,
Arial, sans-serif;"><br>
</span></span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Well that very well might
be true about perception. But Facebook did not say that
OSMF was supporting the project. They representing
correctly. We all here get the difference and understand
that HOT is a different organization. Making this
distinction is not Facebook's problem, but rather HOT and
OSMF should do a better job explaining the complexity of
the whole universe of OSM.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm sure Facebook are not aware of it, like they are not
Corporate members of OSMF. If they can't simple understand and
comply with the attribution, it's sure a third party duty to
elucidate outsiders of the OSM the differences between those two.</p>
<p>Also about the attribution, some of their maps (not all, some
still do not have attribution) since yesterday are displaying this
attribution after clicking on the "i" <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://i.ibb.co/mvxRgg4/facebook.jpg">https://i.ibb.co/mvxRgg4/facebook.jpg
</a>. Can someone explain them that the required attribution is
“© OpenStreetMap
contributors” and not “© OpenStreetMap”. There's plenty of space
to show it properly as "Report a problem with the map" is longer
than “© OpenStreetMap
contributors”. I would do it myself, but they stopped replying to
my emails. Maybe they are not aware how to properly attribute,
must be someone else's duty to explain.<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>