<div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, 02:15 Jeffrey Friedl, <<a href="mailto:jfriedl@yahoo.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">jfriedl@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">> And the hypocrisy goes on. "Strava launches gorgeous new outdoor maps" <a href="https://blog.mapbox.com/strava-launches-gorgeous-new-outdoor-maps-977c74cf37f9" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://blog.mapbox.com/strava-launches-gorgeous-new-outdoor-maps-977c74cf37f9</a><br>
<br>
I'm not sure what you're reporting, but the maps all have "© Mapbox © OpenStreetMap" in the lower-left<br>
corner. (Perhaps they were cut off in some of the screenshots in news coverage, but the actual maps in<br>
the Strava app and on their web site all have this attribution.) I suppose that they could use a slightly <br>
stronger background shadow, to create more contrast when the map behind the attribution is light.<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><b>that is not true. <a href="https://twitter.com/mastermen/status/1127672128797663239?s=09">https://twitter.com/mastermen/status/1127672128797663239?s=09</a></b></div><div dir="auto"><b>I have reported that to them and obviously didn't get a reply from their side. </b></div><div dir="auto"><b>from the moment they use OSM they agreed with it's terms and the reasonable calculated notice (which they don't have on the example of the Medium article 8 shared). a corporate member of OSMF not knowing and not complying with the attribution is a bad example. </b></div></div>