<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>23 Dec 2019, 19:59 by matkoniecz@tutanota.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>23 Dec 2019, 17:59 by joost.schouppe@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;" class="tutanota_quote"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div class=""><blockquote class="" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><p><span class="font" style="font-family:Arial">As an xmas bonus, here's another Facebook
company (via Mapbox), Snapchat that is using OSM without
attribution requirements (funnily there's plenty of space for a
reasonable and visible calculated mapbox logo and text). They
probably don't know, nor that they have been asked to comply
over a year ago, nor have agreed with the license in every
aspect of it when stated using OSM data, nor read Mapbox TOS, or
Mapbox been informed on these repeated offenders, nor read the
multiples reports in mailing lists, nor that they had a employee
that ran for OSMF board.</span><br></p><p><span class="font" style="font-family:Arial"><a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://map.snapchat.com/" target="_blank">https://map.snapchat.com/</a></span><br></p><p><span class="font" style="font-family:Arial">Let's continue to be hypocrites and pretend
nothing is going on for over a year with these two companies
that are corporate members of OSMF and should be the first ones
to give examples. Enough with excuses. </span><br></p></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The Snapchat case is a pretty clear example of how not to do things. If there's space for Mapbox, there's space for OpenStreetMap. But I don't think Snapchat has anything to do with Facebook.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Phil, I hope you contacted them directly and not through Facebook.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>It is quite hard to find place where one<br></div><div>may report this kind of info using email.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I used <a href="mailto:press@snap.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">press@snap.com</a> - is anyone aware <br></div><div>of any better email address for this kind of reports?<br></div></blockquote><div>I also complained at <br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://support.mapbox.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=360000308212">https://support.mapbox.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=360000308212</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>My request was assigned id 77032<br></div><div>according to the automated email.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Has anyone who complained about<br></div><div>Snapchat to Mapbox can check their<br></div><div>inbox archive and share the request id?</div> </body>
</html>