<div dir="auto">You forgot OpenStreetMap.fr and <a href="http://osm.be">osm.be</a></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jan 8, 2020, 07:18 Michael Collinson <<a href="mailto:mike@ayeltd.biz">mike@ayeltd.biz</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>On 2020-01-07 18:27, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>6 Jan 2020, 16:35 by <a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left:1px solid #93a3b8;padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px">
<blockquote>
<div>On 6. Jan 2020, at 07:29, Maarten Deen
<a href="mailto:mdeen@xs4all.nl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"><mdeen@xs4all.nl></a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>Baltic Sea to be the "Baltic Sea" or for South America
to be "South<br>
</div>
<div>America" - this is an example of English imperialism.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>This "imperialism" idea of yours is just your idea. It is
not something that is widely felt.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>regarding imperialism, I think it’s hard to reject the
reasoning that English is in widespread use because of
imperialism. <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Yes, but using it for a pragmatic reasons<br>
</div>
<div>for an international communication is<br>
</div>
<div>usually not imperialism.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I can try to communicate with group of people<br>
</div>
<div>from different countries in Polish,<br>
</div>
<div>Latin, Sindarin or Esperanto.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>But except rare cases using English is likely<br>
</div>
<div>to result in more efficient communication.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Totally agree with Mateusz. English is the current trading
language. It has been Farsi and other languages in the past. It
will probably Mandarin Chinese/simplified hanji in the future. But
right now it is English.</p>
<p>I think the whole debate misses the point. The OSM database is
language-agnostic right now. The <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://www.openstreetmap.org</a>
slippy map was intended to A map show-casing the database. But it
has turned into THE map.</p>
<p>A potential solution is to offer centralised support for other
lingual (and culture, which is not always the same thing) maps.
That of course is a much easier thing to say rather than do as it
requires time and money resource, but it puzzles me why 15 years
into the project we only have 4 layers on our main site.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Mike<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Note that we do have some great projects in the wealthier
economies such as <a href="https://openstreetmap.se/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://openstreetmap.se/</a>
<a href="https://openstreetmap.jp" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://openstreetmap.jp</a> <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.de/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://www.openstreetmap.de/</a> ... Why
aren't these integrated in some way into our main site !?<br>
</p>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</blockquote></div>