<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 1:47 AM Snusmumriken <<a href="mailto:snusmumriken.mapper@runbox.com">snusmumriken.mapper@runbox.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Sat, 2020-01-11 at 21:22 +0100, Martin Trautmann via talk wrote:<br>
> On 20-01-02 12:23, pangoSE wrote:<br>
> <br>
> > A map cannot solve a lack of general awareness when visiting a<br>
> > new/unknown place. Going to the mountains to hike can also be<br>
> > dangerous<br>
> > if you are not well prepared. This is of course not marked on the<br>
> > map!<br>
> <br>
> I agree that I don't know any non-subjective way how to identify such<br>
> an<br>
> area.<br>
<br>
Well, one could rely on authority, e.g. if a national police authority<br>
designated certain areas as high risk. <br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah, that's not really going to work, either. Just look at Portland. Most arrests happen in poor, black neighborhoods, but you're most likely to get hurt or killed in a suburban white area. Besides, if you really want to go that route, just composite their data as a layer over OpenStreetMap in Leaflet. There's no reason whatsoever to include it in OpenStreetMap's database. </div></div></div>