<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Feb 6, 2020, 14:59 by pella.samu@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>Without "empathy" - we can map<i> "nesting locations of vulnerable species"</i> - because of the cold logic of the "<i>on the ground rule"</i><br></div></div></blockquote><div>I am OK with not mapping some objects (private features, rare birds, places of worship where given<br></div><div>religion is persecuted etc)<br></div><div><br></div><div>But I see no good reason to pretend that Russian invasion was not successful,<br></div><div><br></div><div>PS: Yes, the invasion was worrying, wrong, problematic and Russian government is<br></div><div>filled with abhorrent evil people - especially on the top.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It is not changing that they were clearly successful in the invasion.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I fully support applying on the ground rule here. OSM is not mapping world as it should be,<br></div><div>it is mapping it as it exists.<br></div> </body>
</html>