<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>19 Feb 2020, 13:14 by osm@imagico.de:</div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Anyway - while i am not surprised about this it is sobering how little <br></div><div>of the feedback provided in previous conversation - in particular from:<br></div><div><br></div><div>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2019-August/thread.html#83068<br></div><div><br></div><div>has found a substantial reflection in the document. <br></div></blockquote><div>And from <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2019-September/thread.html#83068">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2019-September/thread.html#83068</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Is there at least some list of rejected<br></div><div>feedback with explanation why?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Maybe for example my comments are</div><div>incorrect and there is actually no way to</div><div>fit attribution in the map 500 pixels wide<br></div><div>and odbl actually has exception for<br></div><div>mobile devices that I missed.</div><div><br></div><div>But currently I am unsure whatever<br></div><div>my comments were ignored, taken into<br></div><div>account and rejected as invalid or were<br></div><div>somehow used to improve this document<br></div><div>and are addressed.</div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>I am therfore <br></div><div>reluctant to newly review the document in detail because it seems a <br></div><div>waste of effort.<br></div></blockquote><div>I hope that things can be still fixed.<br></div><div><br></div><div>In particular the claim about 500 pixel<br></div><div>wide map not requiring proper attribution<br></div><div>really should be fixed.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And "mobile devices may have attribution after one interaction" <br></div><div>absolutely MUST be removed.<br></div><div><br></div><div>This part looks like written by Mapbox copyright lawyers<br></div><div>to legitimise their unacceptable attribution hiding.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Hiding attribution behind "i" icon<br></div><div>is not fulfilling ODBL.<br></div><div>It is clearly not enough to make clear that data is from OSM.</div><div><br></div><div>Allowing to keep that means that we capitulate<br></div><div>and allow Mapbox, maps.me, Facebook and others<br></div><div>to use our data without a proper attribution.<br></div><div><br></div><div>There is enough space on mobile devices<br></div><div>to show a proper attribution in the bottom<br></div><div>right corner! (or some other corner).</div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>