<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Mar 5, 2020, 15:39 by rory@technomancy.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On 05/03/2020 15:25, Sören Reinecke via talk wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>couldn't we do a vote about that? Would it be possible for the OSMF to<br></div><div>maintain and coordinate such a voting.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, we _could_.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It would require a 2/3 majority of “active [OSM] contributors”, which is (intentionally) a large number (about 250,000 at the time of writing). I'm sorry, but a licence change to remove the share alike part of the OSM licence has microscopic chance of passing... You'll just have to accept it.<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms">https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms</a><br></div></blockquote><div>And I am pretty sure that migrating Wikidata to ODBL is even less likely.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Sadly, you run into a conflict between strategies of this projects.<br></div><div><br></div><div>To make it even more irritating - imports from Wikidata into OSM are also<br></div><div>impossible in general due to licensing issues.<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>