<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi all</div><div><br></div><div>My 2cts : "in use" status and statuslink to the import proposal would be enough, right?</div><div>Point is to determine where does the tag come from, and it's done by statuslink, not status which reflect the current state of use.</div><div><br></div><div>All the best</div><div><br></div><div>François</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mar. 17 mars 2020 à 10:55, Warin <<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>On 17/3/20 8:22 pm, Marc M. wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Hello Joseph,
it may give the impression that this is the way it should be done.
I agree to identify these "Noise" or poor quality tags, but with a
keyword to show that it's a problem. e.g. status=bad, disputed, error, ...
it would be necessary to find a word that is not as strong as error,
but which nevertheless clearly indicates that this is not an example to
follow.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre></pre>
<pre>Agree with both.
</pre>
<pre>Possible values?
</pre>
<pre>obsolete</pre>
<pre>abandoned</pre>
<pre>discarded</pre>
<pre><a href="https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/forsaken" title="Synonyms of forsaken" target="_blank"><span></span></a></pre>
<pre>archaic</pre>
<pre>passe</pre>
<pre>stale</pre>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<a href="https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/forsaken" title="Synonyms of forsaken" target="_blank"><span></span></a><span>
</span>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</blockquote></div>