<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="ltr"><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><br><br><div dir="ltr">sent from a phone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 6. May 2020, at 00:08, Pierre Béland <pierzenh@yahoo.fr> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">I dont think that it is appropriate to superpose a landuse over a waterway.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>this is a good point, but you could spare the waterway out and just tag the construction site on the land. Depending on the details, bridge span and kind of construction, this can lead to good (temporary) representations or also be inadequate.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Since the tag man_made=bridge is used, it seems better to refer to the construction project with the tags as proposed by <span>Jack Armstrong</span><br></div><div><br></div><div>- man_made=construction</div><div>- construction=bridge</div><div>- layer=1</div></div><div></div></div></div></blockquote><br><div><br></div><div>there are only 40 man_made=construction in the whole world: <a href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=construction">https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=construction</a></div><div><br></div><div>the tag sounds reasonable, but it isn’t really done this way.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers Martin </div></div></body></html>