<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jun 22, 2020, 23:48 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div dir="ltr">sent from a phone<br></div><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 22. Jun 2020, at 23:18, Mateusz Konieczny via talk <talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:<br></div></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;" class="tutanota_quote"><div dir="auto"><div>These had been changed from highway unclassified surface unpaved to highway=track by a mapper with Apple connections.<br></div></div></blockquote><div>Can you link them? I would revert them as tagging for renderer if original mapping<br></div><div>was correct.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>sure, but how would you know the way is an unpaved unclassified road and not a track? You would need local knowledge. Well, what you could probably guess correctly, is that every settlement will be reachable through at least one road and not just tracks. If a road is the only connection between 2 settlements, it is probably a road.<br></div></blockquote><div>I would review aerial and changesets changing that and changeset comments and quality<br></div><div>of work of paid mapper and whatever original mapping was done by someone more trustworthy.<br></div><div><br></div><div>For example if "unclassified=>track" would be described as<br></div><div>"changing unpaved roads to highway=track" and original would be "marking sole road to XYZ"<br></div><div>then revert would be obviously justified.<br></div><div><br></div><div>(real case would be likely murkier)<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>