<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jul 18, 2020, 20:07 by osm-ml@michreichert.de:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Am 18/07/2020 um 19.29 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:<br></div><blockquote><div>Can you link affected data in Poland? <br></div><div><br></div><div>In Poland you actually can reliably estimate real tracktype based solely<br></div><div>on high quality aerial images (not satellite imagery that is unlikely to be <br></div><div>sufficient), typically Geoportal 2 aerial and LIDAR data available in ISOK Cień dataset.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don't have a list of the affected OSM objects at hand but you can<br></div><div>filter his changesets in Poland using OSMCha. Note that I do not<br></div><div>guarantee that Poland is affected at all. It might be that his changes<br></div><div>in Poland are limited to other kinds of contributions like adding nodes<br></div><div>to intersecting roads.<br></div></blockquote><div>In case of anyone planning such automatic revert next step should include<br></div><div>full list of OSM objects that will be affected, to allow checking of what is <br></div><div>actually planned.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Without such overwiew I oppose such edit and I strongly oppose doing such <br></div><div>automatic edit in Poland.<br></div> </body>
</html>