<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Mi., 2. Dez. 2020 um 09:51 Uhr schrieb Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <<a href="mailto:robert.whittaker%2Bosm@gmail.com">robert.whittaker+osm@gmail.com</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 03:41, Michal Migurski <<a href="mailto:mike@teczno.com" target="_blank">mike@teczno.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Facebook is in compliance with the ODbL license which requires that attribution be “reasonably calculated to make any Person that uses, views, accesses, interacts with, or is otherwise exposed to the Produced Work aware” of OSM’s contribution to a map.<br>
<br>
Are you seriously claiming that *every* person who views one of the<br>
maps on Facebook, will either already know that it uses OpenStreetMap<br>
data, or will click on the faint "(i)" logo to find that out? <br></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>yes, this short exchange already demonstrates that there is an evident conflict of interest huge like a skyscraper, implicit in being employed by facebook and serving on the OSM board. By not acknowledging the obvious insufficiency of attribution but rather trying to defend it, Michal has provided the necessary information to evaluate where he stands. Thank you, no more questions. </div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div>Martin<br></div></div>