<div dir="auto">I agree, that link does appear to clearly prove Steve's point, and answer the question as well.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Chuck</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Dec 27, 2020, 12:17 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk <<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div><a href="https://goo.gl/maps/JDYpWMi1Uw6h2wpu9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://goo.gl/maps/JDYpWMi1Uw6h2wpu9</a></div><div> </div><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid #0857a6;margin:10px;padding:0 0 0 10px"><div id="m_-3332354786746927790"><div><div id="m_-3332354786746927790style_16090867940332828521_BODY"><div><div>On Sun, Dec 27, 2020, 10:39 AM Steve Friedl <<a href="//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3asteve@unixwiz.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">steve@unixwiz.net</a>> wrote:</div> <div><div><blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word" lang="EN-US"><div><p>This is nonsense; the building in Nashville has a<strong> HUGE AT&T logo on it</strong>, so this is no kind of secret.</p><p> </p><p>If somebody on the ground can tell it’s an AT&T building, it should be tagged as an AT&T building.</p><p> </p><div><div style="border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;border:none;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"><p><b>From:</b> 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk <<a href="//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>><br><b>Sent:</b> Sunday, December 27, 2020 7:33 AM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aTalk%2dus@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>; <a href="//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aTagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>; <a href="//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3alegal%2dtalk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">legal-talk@openstreetmap.org</a>; <a href="//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [OSM-talk] Bombing, AT&T building, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.</p></div></div><p> </p><div><p>because nobody knows where there at, like a military base, unless you live in the area. <br>and now there under guard.<br> </p><blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #0857a6 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 8.0pt;margin-left:7.5pt;margin-top:7.5pt;margin-right:7.5pt;margin-bottom:7.5pt"><p>Sunday, December 27, 2020 9:01 AM -06:00 from Steve Friedl <<a href="//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3asteve@unixwiz.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">steve@unixwiz.net</a>>:<br> </p><div id="m_-3332354786746927790m_991442730615932969_mr_css_attr"><div><div><div id="m_-3332354786746927790m_991442730615932969style_16090812980897095751_BODY_mr_css_attr"><div><div><p>The building is still there, and why would we untag ALL AT&T buldings?</p></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div><blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #0857a6 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 8.0pt;margin-left:7.5pt;margin-top:7.5pt;margin-right:7.5pt;margin-bottom:7.5pt"><div><div><div><div><div><div><p> </p></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><p><span style="color:#c82613">Do we have the responsibility to un-tag, delete all AT&T building.</span></p><blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #0857a6 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 8.0pt;margin-left:7.5pt;margin-top:7.5pt;margin-right:7.5pt;margin-bottom:7.5pt"><div><div><div><div><div><div><p> </p><div><div><div><p><b>From:</b> 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk <<a href="http:///compose?To=talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>><br><b>Sent:</b> Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:23 AM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3atalk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>; <a href="//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aTalk%2dus@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a>; <a href="http:///compose?To=Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> [OSM-talk] Bombing, AT&T building, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.<br><b>Importance:</b> High</p></div></div><div><p> </p><div><p>Do we have the responsibility to un-tag, delete all AT&T building.</p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>Talk-us mailing list<br><a href="//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aTalk%2dus@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Talk-us@openstreetmap.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us</a></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></div>ry mapping service, not just OSM. Hence, definitely not an example of why a corporation's buildings covered in logos would be something to remove.</blockquote><div> <div> </div><div><div><div> </div></div></div><div><br> </div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
talk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">talk@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a><br>
</blockquote></div>