<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 4, 2021, 21:34 by roland.olbricht@gmx.de:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><blockquote><div>One such example could be when a cycleway was created on top. [...]<br></div><div>I would definitely delete railway tags if they would have remained till<br></div><div>then although I am not sure everybody here would agree with me since<br></div><div>there might still remain "traces" like some heaps of ballast stones on<br></div><div>the sides.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I strongly disagree. In a mountainous region like my home region, the<br></div><div>cycleway then will go through cuttings and on embankments, making the<br></div><div>slope relatively flat.<br></div></blockquote><div>In such case cuttings/embankments count as clear traces of railway.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Cycleways through plains on former tracks are more dubious,<br></div><div>traces are often quite vague and based primarily on historic<br></div><div>data so often not really fitting OSM.<br></div> </body>
</html>