<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:48 AM Mateusz Konieczny via talk <<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>It is based on OSM data, maybe cycleway data is not correctly tagged there?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Another possibility is that OSM is accurate and the local cycling infrastructure <i>really is</i> that bad. I know Oklahoma City has at least one four-way freeway (a freeway running down the median of a surface expressway, effectively allowing the expressway to serve as frontage to the freeway) where the 55 MPH frontage expressway (connected directly to the freeway by ramps every half mile or so) have sharrows, no shoulders, narrow lanes, and curbs. I don't think it's tagged in OSM yet and I'm not down that direction in the state often enough to resurvey it myself. If it is, this would be a perfect example of OSM accurately representing <i>intensely bad</i> cycling infrastructure.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div>