<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Feb 3, 2021, 11:08 by ajt1047@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p><br></p><div class="">On 03/02/2021 07:33, Mateusz Konieczny
via talk wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Is there some already existing tool to get authors of all
people who edited<br></div><div>some specific objects?<br></div></blockquote><p>As a quick way of getting to the list of changesets, something
like<br></p><p><a href="http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=820873588" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=820873588</a><br></p><p>would work.<br></p></blockquote><div>oh, I was unclear.<br></div><div><br></div><div>In this case I wanted to download all currently tagged landuse<br></div><div>(more than 60 000 nodes in just <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10953749">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10953749</a> )<br></div><div>and find all authors.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><blockquote type="cite"><div><br></div><div>I ask this as I run into big undiscussed import, that is likely a
copyright violation<br></div><div> <br></div><div>and involves such uneditable objects as landuse=farmland made
of 933 ways.<br></div></blockquote><p>How best to handle it rather depends what else those 933 ways are
used for - were they existing OSM features or added by the import?<br></p></blockquote><div>Added by an import.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Other considerations would be rubbish the import is (even if not
a copyright violation I can think of some landuse imports that
make OSM worse)<br></div></blockquote><div>I need to check it in more detail to be sure, but quick check is not promising<br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2523318">https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2523318</a><br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2523319">https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2523319</a><br></div><div>(I have not created notes for all spotted issues, just two example ones)<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>and how much IP is left from the original source<br></div></blockquote><div>OEG organiser is describing it as adding traced iagery, I am trying to establish copyright<br></div><div>status of materials they used.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It was referred as source=UNIS, so based on what I know already I created<br></div><div><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UNIS">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UNIS</a> to make it less confusing for other mappers<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>
- while cleaning up some "Google" stuff with a DWG hat on in some
cases I've found some examples of e.g. roads where:<br></div><ul><li>The original source of name and geometry was Google<br></li><li>The name's since been changed to match survey or other valid
source<br></li><li>The geometry's since been changed to match Bing, Esri, or
whatever<br></li><li>There's basically nothing left from "Google" - all that needs
to be done is to redact the appropriate older versions<br></li></ul></blockquote><div>Interesting, I though that in such cases original data taints data (<br></div><div>I thought that would be the same as taking a book, translating it and changing/improving<br></div><div>some parts of story and publishing as my own).<br></div> </body>
</html>