<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>7 Feb 2021, 16:47 by talk@openstreetmap.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><div><span style="color:#333333;">this person is DWG.</span><br></div><div><span style="color:#0c64c0;"><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck_repair" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck_repair</a></span><br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck</a><br></div><div> <br></div><div>and blocks people for ten years,<br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck/blocks_by?page=1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck/blocks_by?page=1</a><br></div></div></blockquote><div>And also doing massive reverts.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And thanks for doing this!<br></div><div><br></div><div>Have you looked at block messages explaining<br></div><div>why they were blocked?<br></div><div> <br></div><div>In general, if I had problem with DWG it</div><div>was lack of blocks and reverts</div><div>in some cases</div><div> (though in general I am very happy with</div><div>them, especially thanks for a <br></div><div>revert of massive undiscussed import in Poland</div><div>on 2020/2021 New Year).</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>contrary to the OSMF ban policy.<br></div></blockquote><div>Frankly speaking: you keep accusing</div><div>people about supposed violations</div><div>without explanation, proof, justification</div><div>or even basic explanation.<br></div><div><br></div><div>If you think that blocking people for</div><div>persistent, repeated, damaging, unwanted</div><div>and forbidden actions is some</div><div>damaging action that I simply disagree with you.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Refusal to communicate<br></div><div>or copyright violations or undiscussed</div><div>mechanical edits is a valid reason for block.</div><div><br></div><div>It is worse than being provably wrong.<br></div><div>Your claims are again unverifiable, unclear,<br></div><div>and probably also based on misunderstanding.</div> </body>
</html>