<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#333399" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p><font face="Verdana">I come to the same conclusion Colin, there
        is a need and advise from the LWG to ask for a waiver.  <br>
      </font></p>
    <p><font face="Verdana">Taking a more detailed look at their data,
        it might be a valuable resource to consider it, being allowed to
        use their data also to verify and improve other maritime borders.<br>
        Can I hope Andy to take the initiative with the DWG for the
        waiver if they consider this is a valuable data source ?</font></p>
    <p><font face="Verdana">Greetings,</font></p>
    <p><font face="Verdana">Bert Araali<br>
      </font></p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 20/02/2021 18:49, Colin Smale wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:578855793.199685.1613836150899@webmail.xs4all.nl">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <meta charset="UTF-8">
      <div>
        <div> Looks like their data is licensed as CC-BY 4.0 which is
          very permissive but I can't say if it is enough for inclusion
          in OSM. </div>
        <div class="default-style"> <a
            href="https://marineregions.org/disclaimer.php"
            moz-do-not-send="true">https://marineregions.org/disclaimer.php</a>
        </div>
        <div class="default-style"> <br>
        </div>
        <div class="default-style"> It actually looks like it may be
          possible, with some additional documentation: </div>
        <div class="default-style"> <a
            href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility"
            moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility</a>
        </div>
        <div class="default-style">
          <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/">https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/</a> </div>
        <div class="default-style"> <br>
        </div>
        <div class="default-style"> They also have ready-made median
          lines available for download, licensed as above. </div>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div> On 02/20/2021 2:54 PM Bert -Araali- Van Opstal
          <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bert.araali.afritastic@gmail.com"><bert.araali.afritastic@gmail.com></a> wrote: </div>
        <div> <br>
        </div>
        <div> <br>
        </div>
        <p><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Can this be a possible
            source (although also simplified vector lines): <br>
            <a href="https://www.marineregions.org/about.php"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.marineregions.org/about.php</a><br>
          </span></p>
        <p>They provide downloadable shape, KML and low resolution data
          files. Someone could ask them to provide us with high
          resolution data as they seemed to have done all the
          calculations according to the UN regulations and International
          Standards. They used PostGIS to produce it.<br>
          <a href="https://www.marineregions.org/downloads.php"
            moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.marineregions.org/downloads.php</a><br>
        </p>
        <p>Didn't look at any License restrictions or conflicts though.</p>
        <p>Greetings,</p>
        <p>Bert Araali<br>
        </p>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> On 20/02/2021 16:32, Colin Smale
          wrote: <br>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div> The Median Lines are defined in terms of the Baselines -
            a simplified representation of the coastline doing specific
            things around islands, bays and estuaries. Perhaps we can
            get hold of the Baseline data and create our own median
            lines mathematically from that? </div>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div> On 02/20/2021 2:13 PM Bert -Araali- Van Opstal <a
                href="mailto:bert.araali.afritastic@gmail.com"
                class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" moz-do-not-send="true"><bert.araali.afritastic@gmail.com></a>
              wrote: </div>
            <div> <br>
            </div>
            <div> <br>
            </div>
            <p><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Dear Andy, list
                members,<br>
              </span></p>
            <p><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Do you have or are
                there resources which we can use to define these Median
                Lines and which cause no licensing conflicts ?<br>
                Do you have the intention to create a wiki page to
                describe this issue and how you plan to implement it ?<br>
              </span></p>
            <p><span style="font-family: Verdana;">If you need some
                help, I am very willing to allocate some time to
                participate.  As I have mapped 325 (mostly
                administrative) boundaries already in JOSM.</span></p>
            <p><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Greetings,</span></p>
            <span style="font-family: Verdana;">Bert Araali</span>
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> On 20/02/2021 14:50, Andy
              Townsend wrote: <br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite"> On 03/02/2021 10:44, Andrew
              Davidson wrote: <br>
              <blockquote type="cite"> <br>
                The Spanish law says that in the absence of an agreement
                with another country, their territorial sea shall not
                extend beyond the median line: <br>
                <br>
                <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                  href="https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/LIS149-Spain.pdf"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/LIS149-Spain.pdf</a>
                <br>
                <br>
                Moroccan law also has the same arrangement: <br>
                <br>
                <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/MAR_1973_Act.pdf"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/MAR_1973_Act.pdf</a>
                <br>
                <br>
                As there is no agreement between the two countries it
                would appear that they both think the boundary is the
                median line. However Morocco amended their law last
                year: <br>
                <br>
                <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.moroccoembassy.co.za/morocco-in-the-news/260-morocco-updates-its-maritime-legislation-to-un-standards"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.moroccoembassy.co.za/morocco-in-the-news/260-morocco-updates-its-maritime-legislation-to-un-standards</a>
                <br>
                <br>
                Details in English are sparse (they haven't sent the
                required paper work to the UN yet), but the changes
                appear to be about their Atlantic maritime boundaries. <br>
                <br>
              </blockquote>
              Thanks Andrew. <br>
              <br>
              I was waiting here just in case anyone posted another
              point of view, and no-one has.  Unfortunately the US
              document (which describes the Spanish point of view) says
              "The Kingdom of Spain also includes its exclaves located
              on the northern coast of Africa, which are beyond the
              scope of this study".  It does, however, describe what
              Spain does elsewhere, which is presumably a "general
              intent".  As you say, the Moroccan article 2 ("In the
              absence of a specific agreement on the subject, the
              breadth of the territorial waters shall not extend beyond
              a median line every point of which is equidistant from the
              nearest points on the baselines of the Moroccan or
              adjacent coasts") is clearer. <br>
              <br>
              Does anyone see a problem with the "median line" approach?
              <br>
              <br>
              If not, does anyone fancy volunteering to actually make
              the change?  It'd need to be someone familiar with
              boundary editing, which probably means familiarity with
              JOSM's "validator" to check that the resulting boundaries
              are both valid multipolygons and match the documentation
              above.  If not, I can do it, but it might take a bit
              longer. <br>
              <br>
              Best Regards, <br>
              <br>
              Andy (from the DWG) <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              _______________________________________________ <br>
              talk mailing list <br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org"
                moz-do-not-send="true">talk@openstreetmap.org</a> <br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
            _______________________________________________ <br>
            talk mailing list <br>
            <a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org"
              class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" moz-do-not-send="true">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
            <br>
            <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk"
              class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
          <pre class="moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
<a href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" moz-do-not-send="true">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a>
</pre>
        </blockquote>
        _______________________________________________ <br>
        talk mailing list <br>
        <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a> <br>
        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a> <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>