<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Whoever is interested in it.<br></div><div><br></div><div>If noone is interested and it got badly out-of date at some point<br></div><div>it becomes OK to delete extreme details.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I deleted some extreme detail because noone (including myself)<br></div><div>was interested in maintaining it.<br></div><div><br></div><div>So I expect that it will reach some equilibrium, as long as people<br></div><div>are willing to delete data of very low quality - even if it used to be<br></div><div>high quality data.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It is fine to map area:highway, it is fine to delete area:highway<br></div><div>if you are updating crossing geometry and you are not interested<br></div><div>in fiddling with areas of roads and footways.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Though making a note and waiting a bit or asking on some forum<br></div><div>for interested people may be a good step before deleting.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Apr 29, 2021, 08:40 by voschix@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="auto">Regarding this abstract duscussion: the real problem with this, and similar issues, who is going to maintain that enormous amount of data? <br></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>