<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/05/2021 00:34, Bert -Araali- Van
Opstal wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:67d3345a-57c7-ef86-6bdb-a4f4430f1374@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p><font face="Verdana">It's OK to make it public, the resource
you refer to is marineregions.com ? <br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">I am in the final process of getting a
waiver to use their data sets.</font></p>
<font face="Verdana">...</font><br>
<font face="Verdana"></font>
<p><font face="Verdana"> So as a start I would suggest to start
with manual tracing or import on individual country basis.<br>
</font></p>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>It'd be good if someone could make a start on an improvement to
the boundary here - this morning I've just reverted a couple of
changes by a sock-puppet of jlcc78 which broke the Moroccan
country relation again (whilst the current situation is surely not
correct, having a country an an invalid multipolygon is even less
correct).</p>
<p>I'd rather than someone else did it rather than me, mostly
because I'm sure that someone else could do a better job of it
than I could! If all else fails, a line drawn that fits with the
description at
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-February/086094.html">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-February/086094.html</a>
would be great.</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Andy (from the DWG)</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>