<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>In general it seems like a good idea to me, though I would want to see<br></div><div dir="auto">source code of such automatic fixer before final confirmation.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">And if you would detect and repair dead links and do at least spot<br></div><div dir="auto">checks of images, it may also convince people who are not fans<br></div><div dir="auto">of such retagging bots that it is overall worth doing.<br></div><div><br></div><div dir="auto">(note: if you oppose such edit please comment now, not after<br></div><div dir="auto">someone will spend time on writing code and so on)<br></div><div><br></div><div>Sep 24, 2021, 19:53 by emiluuu40@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hey,<br></div><div><br></div><div>If I got that right, the tag <i>wikimedia_commons</i> should be valued the "Wikimedia Identifier", so stuff like <i>File:Bobenheim 1.jpg</i>.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Oftentimes though, I see the tag containing just the entire Wikimedia link, so <i>wikimedia_commons=<a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bobenheim_1.jpg" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bobenheim_1.jpg</a></i>.<br></div><div><br></div><div>That could pretty easily be automatically fixed. While doing so, I might also just check if the image even still exists on Wikimedia Commons, as it might've been removed already.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>So, what do you think? - Emil<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>