<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121943595">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121943595</a> has no changeset<br></div><div dir="auto">comments<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">you mention local decisions but do not link them<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Before accusing people on public mailing list and bothering<br></div><div dir="auto">all subscribers - can you try using changeset comments?<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Or at least provide citation for all your main claims?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Also, for example I see no indicator of "with his DWG hat on"<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Also, it seems to be fixing isolated bridge with highway=secondary<br></div><div dir="auto">within highway=tertiary. <br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If I understand it right then it seems a clearly correct edit,<br></div><div dir="auto">and if it violates some tagging idea then such tagging ideas are<br></div><div dir="auto">badly designed and should be modified to stop requiring such<br></div><div dir="auto">fragmentation.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div>Jun 4, 2022, 19:36 by tomasstraupis@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Hello<br></div><div><br></div><div> Can somebody explain to me, how did we come to a situation where<br></div><div>Andy Townsend is knowingly breaking decision of the local community?<br></div><div><br></div><div> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121943595<br></div><div><br></div><div> Mapping of Lithuanian official road classification to OSM road<br></div><div>classes was agreed by Lithuanian community years ago, it was later<br></div><div>revised, classification changed (db updated) according to new schema.<br></div><div>Decision was not my alone (part of discussion was on talk-lt list),<br></div><div>re-tagging to new schema was also not done by me (which also indicates<br></div><div>that it was not my personal decision).<br></div><div><br></div><div> While I understand, that some aspects of this schema might be in<br></div><div>question for people not in local community, but we had some very good<br></div><div>reasons to do so. And in my understanding it is a decision of local<br></div><div>community how we map. Andy Townsend having never been on the spot,<br></div><div>having never spoken to local community, having no understanding of<br></div><div>region should not be above local community. Andy claims he have red<br></div><div>local rules which state very clearly how things should be mapped, but<br></div><div>he made what he calls "interpretation" and mapped differently, knowing<br></div><div>that it contradicts local decision.<br></div><div><br></div><div> Has an official rule that OSMF does not dictate how we map was<br></div><div>dropped recently?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Note: this mail is not about the tagging decision itself (we can<br></div><div>discuss it in a separate thread), but about Andy with his DWG hat on<br></div><div>knowingly breaking it.<br></div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div>Tomas<br></div><div><br></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>talk mailing list<br></div><div>talk@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>