<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>I send it also to <u class=""><a href="mailto:talk-owner@openstreetmap.org">talk-owner@openstreetmap.org</a></u><br></div><div>in attempt to reach moderators<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div>9 cze 2022, 19:51 od ajt1047@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div class="">On 09/06/2022 18:30, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="auto">I think “edit shaming” is supposed to mean
“insulting or embarrassing someone for spelling, grammar or
typographical mistakes” but it is not at all clear what the
phrase means. <br></div></div><div><div><br></div></div></blockquote><p>Some extra definition would certainly help here (including
perhaps some examples) as otherwise translators into other
languages are going to struggle to understand what was meant.<br></p></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Clarification would be helpful as I was sure that it is about complaining about<br></div><div dir="auto">bad edits. And unsure what actually is forbidden - for example is<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">"HOT organised editing is a problem because quality of edits is very often bad<br></div><div dir="auto">and HOT fails to either actually help newbie mappers, or verify their edits.<br></div><div dir="auto">And HOT primarily tries to bring more newbie mappers and reach larger edit<br></div><div dir="auto">volume, instead of trying to improve quality and at least review all edits<br></div><div dir="auto">made as part of HOT organised mapping or focus on recruiting repeat mappers<br></div><div dir="auto">who would map more than once."<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">qualifying as banned edit shaming?<br></div><div dir="auto">(for reference: I consider above as a real issue and not an edit shaming<br></div><div dir="auto">Hmmm, maybe it would be useful to write to HOT - maybe I am wrong<br></div><div dir="auto">and just encountered the worst kind of HOT activity? Anyone knows<br></div><div dir="auto">what would be a good contact point? )<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Is "hahaha <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122063728" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122063728</a> is useless<br></div><div dir="auto">pointless armchair mapping and wrong, this line is not existing anymore,<br></div><div dir="auto">you should stop mapping" qualifying as banned edit shaming?<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">(for reference: I linked my own edit and as far as I know this railway<br></div><div dir="auto">line exists, though I was never there. And I consider landuse=railway<br></div><div dir="auto">mapping as useful<br></div><div dir="auto">But if it would not be a deliberate example with myself as target then<br></div><div dir="auto">I would expect it to be an edit shaming - but it seems so rare<br></div><div dir="auto">and covered by other rules that I am unsure why it got a separate rule)<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Or is "hahaha, you missed 'an' article, stop posting" intended to be banned<br></div><div dir="auto">by edit shaming? Also, why it got a separate rule?<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">BTW, <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Etiquette/Etiquette_Guidelines#Edit_shaming">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Etiquette/Etiquette_Guidelines#Edit_shaming</a><br></div><div dir="auto">never got any resposne.<br></div> </body>
</html>