<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/06/2022 18:30, Joseph Eisenberg
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP_2vPgJfo-EQ7PtuLp055-+LzZbrZc97K-2QL+eFcDXg3yvdg@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div>
        <div dir="auto">I think “edit shaming” is supposed to mean
          “insulting or embarrassing someone for spelling, grammar or
          typographical mistakes” but it is not at all clear what the
          phrase means. </div>
      </div>
      <div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Some extra definition would certainly help here (including
      perhaps some examples) as otherwise translators into other
      languages are going to struggle to understand what was meant.<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP_2vPgJfo-EQ7PtuLp055-+LzZbrZc97K-2QL+eFcDXg3yvdg@mail.gmail.com">
      <div>
        <div>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at
              7:42 AM Yves via talk <<a
                href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>>
              wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div>I have to admit the term 'edit shaming' in the
                guidelines made me raise an eyebrow at the time.<br>
                Sooner or later we'll need to have to draw a line for
                changesets one could feel ashamed of :/</div>
              <div><br>
                Yves <br>
                <br>
                <br>
                <div class="gmail_quote">On 9 June 2022 10:33:19 CEST,
                  Amanda McCann <<a
                    href="mailto:amanda.mccann@osmfoundation.org"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-freetext">amanda.mccann@osmfoundation.org</a>>
                  wrote:
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt
                    0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                    rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                    <pre dir="auto">On Thu, 09 Jun 2022 10:18 +02:00, Simon Poole <<a href="mailto:simon@poole.ch" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">simon@poole.ch</a>> wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid #729fcf;padding-left:1ex">Could the board clarify if linking to changesets is considered doxing or 
not?
</blockquote>
I think that's a decision for the moderation team in how to interpret the EG. If you are unhappy with their decision, then you can appeal that to the OSMF Board.

</pre>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Agreed.</p>
    <p>In a different context with a DWG hat on, suggesting that people
      are overly critical of new mappers (in ways that might be
      considered "edit shaming") and that such criticism isn't fair is
      something that I do quite a bit of.  The DWG sees lots of reports
      of "vandalism", but usually it's just poor editing by
      inexperienced and/or overenthusiastic mappers.<br>
    </p>
    <p>Best Regards,</p>
    <p>Andy<br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
  </body>
</html>