<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/06/2022 18:30, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP_2vPgJfo-EQ7PtuLp055-+LzZbrZc97K-2QL+eFcDXg3yvdg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div>
<div dir="auto">I think “edit shaming” is supposed to mean
“insulting or embarrassing someone for spelling, grammar or
typographical mistakes” but it is not at all clear what the
phrase means. </div>
</div>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Some extra definition would certainly help here (including
perhaps some examples) as otherwise translators into other
languages are going to struggle to understand what was meant.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP_2vPgJfo-EQ7PtuLp055-+LzZbrZc97K-2QL+eFcDXg3yvdg@mail.gmail.com">
<div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at
7:42 AM Yves via talk <<a
href="mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">talk@openstreetmap.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>I have to admit the term 'edit shaming' in the
guidelines made me raise an eyebrow at the time.<br>
Sooner or later we'll need to have to draw a line for
changesets one could feel ashamed of :/</div>
<div><br>
Yves <br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 9 June 2022 10:33:19 CEST,
Amanda McCann <<a
href="mailto:amanda.mccann@osmfoundation.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">amanda.mccann@osmfoundation.org</a>>
wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt
0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<pre dir="auto">On Thu, 09 Jun 2022 10:18 +02:00, Simon Poole <<a href="mailto:simon@poole.ch" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">simon@poole.ch</a>> wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid #729fcf;padding-left:1ex">Could the board clarify if linking to changesets is considered doxing or
not?
</blockquote>
I think that's a decision for the moderation team in how to interpret the EG. If you are unhappy with their decision, then you can appeal that to the OSMF Board.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Agreed.</p>
<p>In a different context with a DWG hat on, suggesting that people
are overly critical of new mappers (in ways that might be
considered "edit shaming") and that such criticism isn't fair is
something that I do quite a bit of. The DWG sees lots of reports
of "vandalism", but usually it's just poor editing by
inexperienced and/or overenthusiastic mappers.<br>
</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Andy<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
</body>
</html>