<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>My problem is that<br></div><div dir="auto">"Anyone with fewer than 5,000 changesets should not be allowed to run for the OSMF board."<br></div><div dir="auto">as example on the list of problematic comments likely to be considered as edit<br></div><div dir="auto">shaming makes me worried/confused as I would consider comments like<br></div><div><br></div><div dir="auto">"Anyone with fewer than 5,000 changesets should not be allowed to run for the OSMF board."<br></div><div dir="auto">"Anyone with fewer than 15 changesets should not be allowed to join OSMF."<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">as OK, even if I would not necessarily agree with this proposals 5000 is too high<br></div><div dir="auto">threshold - but I would actually support some lower threshold like say 15 mapping days<br></div><div dir="auto">in their lifetime.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I also consider "this person made less than 100 OSM map edits" as a valid argument<br></div><div dir="auto">against OSMF board member candidate and assuming otherwise two identical<br></div><div dir="auto">candidates with one being an active OSM mapper and one not, I would prefer mapper.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>10 cze 2022, 18:06 od allan@mustard.net:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p><span class="font" style="font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Mateusz,</span><br></p><p><span class="font" style="font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">I recommend that you
not go down a rabbit hole of offering up hypothetical examples
of what people might say and then ask us moderators to predict
whether it will or will not evoke a complaint from someone else
in the community. As for proactive responses from the moderators
(i.e., responses initiated without a complaint from someone in
the community), those will occur in the event of aggressive or
abusive discourse. I don't think you need an explanation of what
that means. </span><br></p><p><span class="font" style="font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">In a nutshell,
moderation is being imposed on the lists in order to ensure that
the dialogues on the list reflect respect for members of the
community, and that arguments are dispassionate, i.e., are not
written in a manner that will tend to evoke negative reactions.
Whether this or that statement will deeply offend another
community member is something we shall have to wait and see to
determine, case by case. If you want a rule of thumb, be polite!
Be respectful! </span><br></p><p><span class="font" style="font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Please also bear in
mind that the moderators will examine complaints case by case.
If a frivolous complaint comes to the moderators, it will in all
likelihood be treated as frivolous. </span><br></p><p><span class="font" style="font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">cheers,<br> Allan Mustard<br> apm-wa</span></p></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>