<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Oct 26, 2022, 12:05 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>sent from a phone<br></div><blockquote><div>On 26 Oct 2022, at 11:45, Mateusz Konieczny via talk <talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:<br></div><div><br></div><div>Note that when you found some gone railway<br></div><div>mapped in OSM then it is useful<br></div><div><br></div><div>- edit OSM object to note which traces are left if any<br></div><div>(ideally, it would be done by original mapper)<br></div><div><br></div><div>- or delete nonexistent sections without traces<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>what is the scale/resolution for determining a “non-existent” section? If you do it too fine grained, it would be like mapping a dashed divider line, with yes/no alternating every 2 meters.<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">If road was rebuild and as result there is 10m wide gap where embankment <br></div><div dir="auto">was obliterated then I would delete such section of railway=abandoned/railway=razed<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">But if someone would initially map it then I would not complain about it<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Is a former station a trace that is valid in this sense?<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">if train station/platform trace remains then mapping them is fine<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">but if railway track between them is obliterated without trace then such track<br></div><div dir="auto">is not mappable and should be deleted if it is mapped<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>