<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 2, 2023, 21:59 by ajt1047@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On 02/01/2023 20:44, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>way/node/relation ids in OSM are unstable, not promised to be stable and<br></div><div>anything relying on their stability can break at any point<br></div></blockquote><div>Unfortunately, that sort of "black and white" answer doesn't really answer the question of whether it's useful to link to OSM data like that.<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">It is often useful, but we should try to avoid implying that this ids will stay stable forever.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1325892214">https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1325892214</a> works well as link for such cases,<br></div><div dir="auto">making some official uri scheme is implying things that we should not be implying.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>It's certainly possible (as I've said in that discussion) to use OSM IDs as "stable enough to do real work with" - I do it all the time.<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">I also do this, but without expectations of id stability. <br></div> </body>
</html>