<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="auto">On assumption that they move significantly and this geometry is not stable...<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I think that they should not be mapped and definitely not as footways<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Feb 18, 2025, 01:27 by andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="auto">I'm currently at Dubai Airport, and StreetComplete is showing me that<br></div><div dir="auto">someone has mapped every airbridge, as a set of several ways (example:<br></div><div dir="auto">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1271426361 and adjacent ways ).<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">This is odd, as they are moveable.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">They are also tagged highway=footway, and for each way StreetComplete<br></div><div dir="auto">is asking me whether they are lit; and what surface they have.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Is there a better way to map air bridges? Should they be converted to<br></div><div dir="auto">"aeroway=jet_bridge"?<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I note this 2010 proposal:<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Aerobridge<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">-- <br></div><div dir="auto">Andy Mabbett<br></div><div dir="auto">http://pigsonthewing.org.uk<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">_______________________________________________<br></div><div dir="auto">talk mailing list<br></div><div dir="auto">talk@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div dir="auto">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk<br></div></blockquote> </body>
</html>