[Tilesathome] Batik testing [waS Re: Osmarender Bugfix Followup]

Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-list at deelkar.net
Mon Oct 22 13:19:04 BST 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Brent Easton schrieb:
> The only outstanding problem with Batik seems to be the bounding box issue with the icons. The icons need to be updated so that the bounding box matches the actual size of the icons. Inkscape appears to ignore the box, whereas Batik clips the icons to the (incorrect) bounding box.
> 
> Early results from benchmarking indicates that Batik is sowehat slower than Inkscape, but I need to do a lot more testing. There may also be scope to customize the Batik rasterizer to split the tiles into strips more efficiently.

- From my experience slowness is not a problem if

A) it is better with complex tiles, for example the ability to render my
current benchmark, the "Rotterdam Tile" at z12 (2098,1354) at all.

B) there would be a way to skript exports as opposed to having to load
the entire svg for each stripe completely anew.

C) it hass less "quirks" than inkscape (see the troubleshooting part of
the t at h install guide wiki pages)

- --

Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHHJU3FUbODdpRVDwRAl+GAKC0Owm758M0LCCh8ikIsk6a3RvLxQCbBNeW
A12r+qc3+3Ewp5pieAi0wVM=
=AWbT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Tilesathome mailing list